• The Rochesterian in Your Inbox:

    Join 622 other subscribers

The Democrat and Chronicle reported today Assemblyman David Gantt would reintroduce his legislation giving Rochester’s mayor control of the school district.

This is not a surprise, as it has already passed the assembly. The bill has powerful allies in Gantt, Assemblyman Joe Morelle, Lieutenant Governor Bob Duffy and the business community. But the state senate is a lot trickier, as senators Joe Robach and Jim Alesi have expressed strong reservations.

Meanwhile, a lot has changed in the two years since then-Mayor Duffy campaigned for control of schools.

  • We have a new mayor who may not want the job as badly as his predecessor. Tom Richards  never talks about mayoral control unless prompted and doesn’t do so with any depth. While Richards has expressed support for mayoral control, I find it hard to believe Albany would hand over control of a $700-million-a-year, 32,000-student district to a man who lacks any outward passion for taking the reigns. There’s still time for Richards to show he wants control of the district. So far, he hasn’t laid out any vision.
  • Opposition to mayoral control has grown among area residents. The 2011 Voice of the Voter poll shows 50 percent of respondents oppose and 38 percent support mayoral control. In the 2010 poll, only 30 percent opposed mayoral control.
  • New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s record on education has been knocked in polls and gains in test scores under his leadership were nearly wiped out.
  • The Rochester City School District is no longer run by mayoral-control-friendly Jean-Claude Brizard.  The district is in a state of relative calm compared to the turmoil of the last few years. Is it time to rock the apple cart as the school board searches for a new leader – one who may already be in the position? Maybe it’s the perfect time, if you want to install the mayor as chief.

3 Responses to Mayoral Control Lost Momentum

  1. I think Mr. Gantt just can’t help himself. This fall, a member of the Community Education Task Force — a vehemently anti-mayoral-control organization — was not only elected to the school board, but also bumped out a member who carried Gantt’s water on the board. It must be galling to Mr. Gantt to have his influence diminished over an elected body so central to “his” city’s life and politics.

    What he can’t control, he’ll try to undermine and attack.

  2. Does anybody know if Gantt donated his pension money to “help the children”? I think it was a year ago there were reports about Gantt and “double dipping”, and he was crying on t.v. saying he would use his pension to start a scholarship fund to help city kids go to college.

    His salary is $94,500 – his pension is $82,000.

    Did he ever start the scholarship fund?

  3. April 16, 2012 at 4:10 pm CitizensArrest responds:

    Mayoral control has been a unmitigated disaster in Chicago and has only become worse with Brizard and Rahm. The mayor claims that the former board members of the AUSL charter school group who now are on the CPS board have no conflict of interest since they no longer work at AUSL! Guess who gets all the contracts for charters to go into closed/turned around schools?I just saw a flock of pigs fly overhead…………….An elected board answers to those who elected them, a mayoral board answers to no citizens at all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *